On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:19:22PM -0700, Chun Yan Liu wrote:
On 12/9/2014 at 05:44 PM, in message 2014120909.gb29...@redhat.com,
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:27:46AM +0800, Chunyan Liu wrote:
libxl supports sysrq. Add .domainSendKey
On 12/10/2014 at 05:21 PM, in message 20141210092125.gb6...@redhat.com,
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:19:22PM -0700, Chun Yan Liu wrote:
On 12/9/2014 at 05:44 PM, in message
2014120909.gb29...@redhat.com,
Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:27:46AM +0800, Chunyan Liu wrote:
libxl supports sysrq. Add .domainSendKey function to support
sending sysrq key.
I think this is really bending the semantics of the virDomainSendKey
API too much. This API is documented to inject *any* scancodes into
the guest
On 12/9/2014 at 05:44 PM, in message 2014120909.gb29...@redhat.com,
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:27:46AM +0800, Chunyan Liu wrote:
libxl supports sysrq. Add .domainSendKey function to support
sending sysrq key.
I think this is really
libxl supports sysrq. Add .domainSendKey function to support
sending sysrq key.
Signed-off-by: Chunyan Liu cy...@suse.com
---
src/libxl/libxl_driver.c | 89
1 file changed, 89 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/libxl/libxl_driver.c
