On one hand, numad probably will manage the affinity of domain process
dynamically in future. On the other hand, even numad won't manage it,
it still could confusion. Let's make things simpler enough to avoid
the lair for now.
---
src/qemu/qemu_driver.c |7 +++
1 files changed, 7
On 10/24/2012 12:00 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
On one hand, numad probably will manage the affinity of domain process
dynamically in future. On the other hand, even numad won't manage it,
s/even/even if/
it still could confusion. Let's make things simpler enough to avoid
s/could/could cause/
On 2012年10月24日 21:38, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On 10/24/2012 12:00 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
On one hand, numad probably will manage the affinity of domain process
dynamically in future. On the other hand, even numad won't manage it,
s/even/even if/
it still could confusion. Let's make things
On 2012年10月24日 21:45, Osier Yang wrote:
On 2012年10月24日 21:38, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On 10/24/2012 12:00 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
On one hand, numad probably will manage the affinity of domain process
dynamically in future. On the other hand, even numad won't manage it,
s/even/even if/
it
On 10/24/2012 03:45 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
On 2012年10月24日 21:38, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On 10/24/2012 12:00 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
On one hand, numad probably will manage the affinity of domain process
dynamically in future. On the other hand, even numad won't manage it,
s/even/even if/
it
On 2012年10月24日 21:54, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On 10/24/2012 03:45 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
On 2012年10月24日 21:38, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On 10/24/2012 12:00 PM, Osier Yang wrote:
On one hand, numad probably will manage the affinity of domain process
dynamically in future. On the other hand,
