On 12/13/2011 06:52 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 12/06/2011 01:38 AM, Eric Blake Write:
* libvirt.spec.in (with_sanlock): On RHEL, don't force sanlock
on architectures where it isn't available.
---
libvirt.spec.in | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
++#
At 12/06/2011 01:38 AM, Eric Blake Write:
* libvirt.spec.in (with_sanlock): On RHEL, don't force sanlock
on architectures where it isn't available.
---
libvirt.spec.in | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in
index
* libvirt.spec.in (with_sanlock): On RHEL, don't force sanlock
on architectures where it isn't available.
---
libvirt.spec.in | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in
index 35762a5..39c814a 100644
--- a/libvirt.spec.in
+++
On 12/05/2011 10:38 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
* libvirt.spec.in (with_sanlock): On RHEL, don't force sanlock
on architectures where it isn't available.
---
libvirt.spec.in | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in
index
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 10:38:51AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
* libvirt.spec.in (with_sanlock): On RHEL, don't force sanlock
on architectures where it isn't available.
---
libvirt.spec.in | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in