On 09/21/2012 04:13 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On 09/21/12 21:46, Laine Stump wrote:
>> Every level of the code for virNetworkUpdate was assuming that some
>> other level was checking for validity of the "command" arg, but none
>> actually were. The result was that an invalid command code would do
>
On 09/21/12 21:46, Laine Stump wrote:
Every level of the code for virNetworkUpdate was assuming that some
other level was checking for validity of the "command" arg, but none
actually were. The result was that an invalid command code would do
nothing, but also report success.
Since the command c
Every level of the code for virNetworkUpdate was assuming that some
other level was checking for validity of the "command" arg, but none
actually were. The result was that an invalid command code would do
nothing, but also report success.
Since the command code isn't used until the very lowest lev
