On 11/15/12 00:20, Eric Blake wrote:
On 11/14/2012 11:43 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
Bleah. Raw XML parsing. Wouldn't it be easier in and cleaner convert
this piece code to use the XML parser and xpath?
Not the first time we've done this. I agree that using the XML parser
and xpath is probably nice
On 11/14/2012 11:43 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Bleah. Raw XML parsing. Wouldn't it be easier in and cleaner convert
>> this piece code to use the XML parser and xpath?
>
> Not the first time we've done this. I agree that using the XML parser
> and xpath is probably nicer, but it actually takes more
On 11/13/2012 05:16 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On 11/13/12 20:09, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Now that we can filter on this information, we should also make
>> it easy to get at.
>>
>> * tools/virsh-snapshot.c (cmdSnapshotInfo): Add another output
>> row.
>> ---
>> tools/virsh-snapshot.c | 32 ++
On 11/13/12 20:09, Eric Blake wrote:
Now that we can filter on this information, we should also make
it easy to get at.
* tools/virsh-snapshot.c (cmdSnapshotInfo): Add another output
row.
---
tools/virsh-snapshot.c | 32 +++-
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 del
Now that we can filter on this information, we should also make
it easy to get at.
* tools/virsh-snapshot.c (cmdSnapshotInfo): Add another output
row.
---
tools/virsh-snapshot.c | 32 +++-
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/virsh-snaps
