Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 3/5] Introduce @secure attribute to os loader element

2016-08-04 Thread Pavel Hrdina
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:11:11PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 04.08.2016 12:19, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:43:50AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > >> This element will control secure boot implemented by some > >> firmwares. If the firmware used in does support

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 3/5] Introduce @secure attribute to os loader element

2016-08-04 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 04.08.2016 12:19, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:43:50AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> This element will control secure boot implemented by some >> firmwares. If the firmware used in does support the >> feature we must tell it to the underlying hypervisor. However, we >>

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 3/5] Introduce @secure attribute to os loader element

2016-08-04 Thread Pavel Hrdina
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:43:50AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > This element will control secure boot implemented by some > firmwares. If the firmware used in does support the > feature we must tell it to the underlying hypervisor. However, we > can't know whether loader does support it or

[libvirt] [PATCH 3/5] Introduce @secure attribute to os loader element

2016-07-27 Thread Michal Privoznik
This element will control secure boot implemented by some firmwares. If the firmware used in does support the feature we must tell it to the underlying hypervisor. However, we can't know whether loader does support it or not just by looking at the file. Therefore we have to have an attribute to