On 05/22/2012 01:30 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 05/20/2012 09:56 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
This patch wires up the RPC protocol handlers for
virConnectListAllDomains(). The RPC generator has no support for the way
how virConnectListAllDomains() returns the results so the handler code
had to be done
On 05/22/2012 08:05 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
+
+struct remote_connect_list_all_domains_ret {
+remote_nonnull_domain domains;
This is an unbounded array; we aren't using any of these anywhere else.
I wonder if reusing REMOTE_DOMAIN_ID_LIST_MAX would be reasonable
instead. Then again,
On 05/20/2012 09:56 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
This patch wires up the RPC protocol handlers for
virConnectListAllDomains(). The RPC generator has no support for the way
how virConnectListAllDomains() returns the results so the handler code
had to be done manually.
The new api is handled by
This patch wires up the RPC protocol handlers for
virConnectListAllDomains(). The RPC generator has no support for the way
how virConnectListAllDomains() returns the results so the handler code
had to be done manually.
The new api is handled by REMOTE_PROC_CONNECT_LIST_ALL_DOMAINS, with
number
