On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 04:25 PM +0200, Marc Hartmayer
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 06:53 PM +0200, John Ferlan
> wrote:
>> Because we allow a QEMU_JOB_DESTROY to occur while we're starting
>> up and we drop the @vm lock prior to qemuMonitorOpen, it's possible
>> that a domain destroy opera
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 06:53 PM +0200, John Ferlan wrote:
> Because we allow a QEMU_JOB_DESTROY to occur while we're starting
> up and we drop the @vm lock prior to qemuMonitorOpen, it's possible
> that a domain destroy operation "wins" the race, calls qemuProcessStop
> which will free and reinit
Because we allow a QEMU_JOB_DESTROY to occur while we're starting
up and we drop the @vm lock prior to qemuMonitorOpen, it's possible
that a domain destroy operation "wins" the race, calls qemuProcessStop
which will free and reinitialize priv->monConfig. Depending on the
exact timing either qemuMon