Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 4/4] virQEMUCapsHasPCIMultiBus: assume true if we have no version information

2017-11-30 Thread Ján Tomko
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:10:26AM -0500, John Ferlan wrote: On 11/29/2017 09:58 AM, Ján Tomko wrote: In status XML, we do not store the QEMU version information, we only format all the capabilities. We dropped QEMU_CAPS_PCI_MULTIBUS in commit 5b783379 which was released in libvirt 3.2.0.

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 4/4] virQEMUCapsHasPCIMultiBus: assume true if we have no version information

2017-11-30 Thread John Ferlan
On 11/29/2017 09:58 AM, Ján Tomko wrote: > In status XML, we do not store the QEMU version information, we only > format all the capabilities. We dropped QEMU_CAPS_PCI_MULTIBUS > in commit 5b783379 which was released in libvirt 3.2.0. > > Therefore the only way of telling if the already running

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 4/4] virQEMUCapsHasPCIMultiBus: assume true if we have no version information

2017-11-30 Thread Pavel Hrdina
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 03:58:57PM +0100, Ján Tomko wrote: > In status XML, we do not store the QEMU version information, we only > format all the capabilities. We dropped QEMU_CAPS_PCI_MULTIBUS > in commit 5b783379 which was released in libvirt 3.2.0. > > Therefore the only way of telling if the

[libvirt] [PATCH 4/4] virQEMUCapsHasPCIMultiBus: assume true if we have no version information

2017-11-29 Thread Ján Tomko
In status XML, we do not store the QEMU version information, we only format all the capabilities. We dropped QEMU_CAPS_PCI_MULTIBUS in commit 5b783379 which was released in libvirt 3.2.0. Therefore the only way of telling if the already running domain at the time of daemon restart has been