On Fri, 2018-08-31 at 15:29 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 04:25:25PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-08-31 at 15:05 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > This should really be in src/util/virpci.{c,h}, since that's where the
> > >
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 04:25:25PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-08-31 at 15:05 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 04:00:45PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, even after this change functions
> > > handling virPCIDeviceAddress are split
On Fri, 2018-08-31 at 15:05 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 04:00:45PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > Unfortunately, even after this change functions
> > handling virPCIDeviceAddress are split pretty much
> > evenly between conf/device_conf and utils/virpci:
> >
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 04:00:45PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> It's a better fit than domain_conf.
>
> Unfortunately, even after this change functions
> handling virPCIDeviceAddress are split pretty much
> evenly between conf/device_conf and utils/virpci:
> ideally everything would be moved
It's a better fit than domain_conf.
Unfortunately, even after this change functions
handling virPCIDeviceAddress are split pretty much
evenly between conf/device_conf and utils/virpci:
ideally everything would be moved to the former,
including the struct declaration itself, and all the
names
