On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 13:37:12 -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 12/16/2016 11:24 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > The code at first changed the definition and then rolled it back in case
> > of failure. This was ridiculous. Refactor the code so that the image in
> > the definition is changed only
On 12/16/2016 11:24 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> The code at first changed the definition and then rolled it back in case
> of failure. This was ridiculous. Refactor the code so that the image in
> the definition is changed only when the snapshot is successful.
>
> The refactor will also simplify
The code at first changed the definition and then rolled it back in case
of failure. This was ridiculous. Refactor the code so that the image in
the definition is changed only when the snapshot is successful.
The refactor will also simplify further fix of image locking when doing
snapshots.
---
