Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 4/6] test: Add various vir*Flags API

2019-07-10 Thread Eric Blake
On 7/8/19 10:37 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > Even though we don't accept any flags, it is unfriendly to callers > that use the modern API to have to fall back to the flag-free API. > > Note that virDomainBlockStats does not trivially forward to > virDomainBlockStatsFlags, so that one is omitted. > >

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 4/6] test: Add various vir*Flags API

2019-07-09 Thread Peter Krempa
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 22:37:01 -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > Even though we don't accept any flags, it is unfriendly to callers > that use the modern API to have to fall back to the flag-free API. > > Note that virDomainBlockStats does not trivially forward to > virDomainBlockStatsFlags, so that

[libvirt] [PATCH 4/6] test: Add various vir*Flags API

2019-07-08 Thread Eric Blake
Even though we don't accept any flags, it is unfriendly to callers that use the modern API to have to fall back to the flag-free API. Note that virDomainBlockStats does not trivially forward to virDomainBlockStatsFlags, so that one is omitted. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake ---