On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:29:27AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 06:05:26PM +, Paul Jenner wrote:
> > Hi Adam.
> >
> > On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 13:17 -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> > > Define a new command 'dommemstats' to report domain memory statistics.
> > > The
> >
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 06:05:26PM +, Paul Jenner wrote:
> Hi Adam.
>
> On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 13:17 -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> > Define a new command 'dommemstats' to report domain memory statistics. The
> > output format is inspired by 'domblkstat' and 'domifstat'
>
> Minor point but as thi
Hi Adam.
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 13:17 -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> Define a new command 'dommemstats' to report domain memory statistics. The
> output format is inspired by 'domblkstat' and 'domifstat'
Minor point but as this is inspired by existing 'domblkstat' and
'domifstat', why 'dommemstats' i
Define a new command 'dommemstats' to report domain memory statistics. The
output format is inspired by 'domblkstat' and 'domifstat' and consists of
tag/value pairs, one per line. The command can complete successfully and print
no output if virDomainMemoryStats is supported by the driver, but not
Define a new command 'dommemstats' to report domain memory statistics. The
output format is inspired by 'domblkstat' and 'domifstat' and consists of
tag/value pairs, one per line. The command can complete successfully and print
no output if virDomainMemoryStats is supported by the driver, but not
Define a new command 'dommemstats' to report domain memory statistics. The
output format is inspired by 'domblkstat' and 'domifstat' and consists of
tag/value pairs, one per line. The command can complete successfully and print
no output if virDomainMemoryStats is supported by the driver, but not
