On 07/15/14 22:29, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 07/15/2014 07:25 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>> When the backing store of a volume wasn't accessible while updating the
>> volume definition the call would fail alltogether. In cases where we
>
> s/alltogether/altogether/
>
>> currently (incorrectly) treat re
On 07/15/2014 07:25 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> When the backing store of a volume wasn't accessible while updating the
> volume definition the call would fail alltogether. In cases where we
s/alltogether/altogether/
> currently (incorrectly) treat remote backing stores as local one this
> might le
When the backing store of a volume wasn't accessible while updating the
volume definition the call would fail alltogether. In cases where we
currently (incorrectly) treat remote backing stores as local one this
might lead to strange errors.
Ignore the opening errors until we figure out how to trac
