On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 11:05:28AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 03/03/2014 12:18 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Both
of these options have a notable performance impact, however, and
it is believed that worst case behaviour where the fields are
read concurrently with being written would
On 03/10/2014 04:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 11:05:28AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 03/03/2014 12:18 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Both
of these options have a notable performance impact, however, and
it is believed that worst case behaviour where the fields are
On 03/03/2014 12:18 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Currently the log filter strings are used in a string comparison
against the source filename each time log message is emitted.
If no log filters at all are set, there's obviously no string
comparison to be done. If any single log filter is set
Currently the log filter strings are used in a string comparison
against the source filename each time log message is emitted.
If no log filters at all are set, there's obviously no string
comparison to be done. If any single log filter is set though,
this imposes a compute burden on every logging
