Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 6/7] node_device: introduce new capability FC_RPORT

2017-05-26 Thread Bjoern Walk
John Ferlan [2017-05-25, 03:26PM -0400]: On 05/22/2017 02:38 AM, Bjoern Walk wrote: Similar to scsi_host and fc_host, there is a relation between a scsi_target and its transport specific fc_remote_port. Let's expose this relation and relevant information behind it. An example for a virsh nod

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 6/7] node_device: introduce new capability FC_RPORT

2017-05-25 Thread John Ferlan
On 05/22/2017 02:38 AM, Bjoern Walk wrote: > Similar to scsi_host and fc_host, there is a relation between a > scsi_target and its transport specific fc_remote_port. Let's expose this > relation and relevant information behind it. > > An example for a virsh nodedev-dumpxml: > > virsh # node

[libvirt] [PATCH 6/7] node_device: introduce new capability FC_RPORT

2017-05-21 Thread Bjoern Walk
Similar to scsi_host and fc_host, there is a relation between a scsi_target and its transport specific fc_remote_port. Let's expose this relation and relevant information behind it. An example for a virsh nodedev-dumpxml: virsh # nodedev-dumpxml scsi_target0_0_0 scsi_target0_0_0