On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 01:34:15PM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 01:23:14PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > On 3/7/19 1:07 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 12:52:46PM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > > > > However, looking at the bigger picture i
On 3/7/19 1:27 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 01:23:14PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 3/7/19 1:07 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 12:52:46PM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
However, looking at the bigger picture is this a safe thing to do? I mean,
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 01:23:14PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 3/7/19 1:07 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 12:52:46PM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > > > However, looking at the bigger picture is this a safe thing to do? I
> > > > mean,
> > > > imagine the followi
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 01:23:14PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 3/7/19 1:07 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 12:52:46PM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > > > However, looking at the bigger picture is this a safe thing to do? I
> > > > mean,
> > > > imagine the followi
On 3/7/19 1:07 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 12:52:46PM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
However, looking at the bigger picture is this a safe thing to do? I mean,
imagine the following scenario:
1) say there is capability X that affects certain part of cmd line. And
assume t
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 12:52:46PM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > However, looking at the bigger picture is this a safe thing to do? I mean,
> > imagine the following scenario:
> >
> > 1) say there is capability X that affects certain part of cmd line. And
> > assume that those two possibilities a
> However, looking at the bigger picture is this a safe thing to do? I mean,
> imagine the following scenario:
>
> 1) say there is capability X that affects certain part of cmd line. And
> assume that those two possibilities are incompatible. If cmd line is
> generated one way then migration to a q
On 2/21/19 4:42 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
Prepare for removal of deprecated flags from the capability
string array and quietly drop flags present in the deprecated
string array if they were not found in the main array.
Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko
---
src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 12 +---
1
Prepare for removal of deprecated flags from the capability
string array and quietly drop flags present in the deprecated
string array if they were not found in the main array.
Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko
---
src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 12 +---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletio
