Re: [libvirt] [PATCH RESEND] Interface: return appropriate status for bridge device

2017-08-03 Thread Laine Stump
On 08/02/2017 05:09 PM, John Ferlan wrote: > [pardon the top-post comment] > Doing some (personal) mail box cleaning and found this "older" patch... > Sorry that this has sat unattended (and probably now forgotten or given > up on) for so long. Suppose it's an assumption that someone like Laine >

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH RESEND] Interface: return appropriate status for bridge device

2017-08-02 Thread John Ferlan
[pardon the top-post comment] Doing some (personal) mail box cleaning and found this "older" patch... Sorry that this has sat unattended (and probably now forgotten or given up on) for so long. Suppose it's an assumption that someone like Laine who understand bonds/bridges better than others

[libvirt] [PATCH RESEND] Interface: return appropriate status for bridge device

2017-02-13 Thread Lin Ma
In function udevInterfaceIsActive, The current design relies on the sys attribute 'operstate' to determine whether the interface is active. For the device node of virtual network(say virbr0), There is already a dummy tap device to maintain a fixed mac on it, So it's available and its status