On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 21:25 +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 17:54:55 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > Applies on top of [req].
> >
> > RFC because we still don't have a way of probing QEMU to figure
> > out whether the relevant toggles are available. Plus, there's no
> >
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 17:54:55 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> Applies on top of [req].
>
> RFC because we still don't have a way of probing QEMU to figure
> out whether the relevant toggles are available. Plus, there's no
> documentation yet :)
I wanted to moan about missing docs and sub-par
Applies on top of [req].
RFC because we still don't have a way of probing QEMU to figure
out whether the relevant toggles are available. Plus, there's no
documentation yet :)
Changes from [RFCv1]:
* don't nest features inside a element;
* implement all optional features.
[req]
