On 05/29/2014 05:47 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> Still not quite right ... vshCommandOptUInt currently wraps negative
> numbers to their 2's complement and stores them in the uint.
I recently tweaked virstring.c to provide virStrToLong_uip and friends
for rejecting negative input when parsing unsign
On 05/29/14 16:51, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/29/2014 05:47 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>
>> Still not quite right ... vshCommandOptUInt currently wraps negative
>> numbers to their 2's complement and stores them in the uint.
>
> I recently tweaked virstring.c to provide virStrToLong_uip and friends
>
On 05/29/14 05:34, Jincheng Miao wrote:
> vcpupin will allow argument --vcpu as a signed number,
> and pass it to virDomainPinVcpu directlly without
> checking if this value is positive(valid).
>
>> virsh vcpupin r7 -1 0
> error: numerical overflow: input too large: 4294967295
>
> This message is
vcpupin will allow argument --vcpu as a signed number,
and pass it to virDomainPinVcpu directlly without
checking if this value is positive(valid).
> virsh vcpupin r7 -1 0
error: numerical overflow: input too large: 4294967295
This message is inaccurate, and the negative vcpu is
non-valuable. So
