On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 01:10:38PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:07:23PM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 7:06 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 01:04:57PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 05:47:54
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > @Daniel,
> >
> > the enum values are same with `type`
> >
> > unified: 0
> > instruction: 1
> > data: 2
> >
> > but scope should be both(0)/code(1)/data(2), so the attribute name will be
>
> 'both' and 'unified' mean the same thing.
>
> 'instruction' and
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:07:23PM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 7:06 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 01:04:57PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 05:47:54PM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The name do
On Friday, 7 April 2017 at 7:06 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 01:04:57PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 05:47:54PM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The name doesn't really matter that much, 'scope' makes a bit more
> > > > sense, 'ty
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 01:04:57PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 05:47:54PM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:
> > >
> > > The name doesn't really matter that much, 'scope' makes a bit more
> > > sense, 'type' is consistent with the cache bank specification, I'm fine
> > > with any
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 05:47:54PM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:
The name doesn't really matter that much, 'scope' makes a bit more
sense, 'type' is consistent with the cache bank specification, I'm fine
with any. The big question here was if it is possible to have:
And from what you say, the sim
>
> The name doesn't really matter that much, 'scope' makes a bit more
> sense, 'type' is consistent with the cache bank specification, I'm fine
> with any. The big question here was if it is possible to have:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> And from what you say, the simple answer is "yes". So we need to hav
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 09:38:39AM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:
On Thursday, 6 April 2017 at 8:46 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 08:20:56PM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:
> This patch is based on Martin's cache branch.
>
> This patch amends the cache bank capability as follow:
It hel
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 09:51:02AM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:
On Thursday, 6 April 2017 at 9:04 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 01:25:35PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 08:20:56PM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:
> > This patch is based on Martin's cache br
On Thursday, 6 April 2017 at 9:04 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 01:25:35PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 08:20:56PM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:
> > > This patch is based on Martin's cache branch.
> > >
> > > This patch amends the cache bank ca
On Thursday, 6 April 2017 at 8:46 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 08:20:56PM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:
> > This patch is based on Martin's cache branch.
> >
> > This patch amends the cache bank capability as follow:
>
> It helps a lot if you wait for a conclusion on a pat
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 01:25:35PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 08:20:56PM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:
This patch is based on Martin's cache branch.
This patch amends the cache bank capability as follow:
Why do we need to report 'type' on both bank & contro
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 02:46:10PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 08:20:56PM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:
> > This patch is based on Martin's cache branch.
> >
> > This patch amends the cache bank capability as follow:
> >
>
> It helps a lot if you wait for a conclusion on a
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 08:20:56PM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:
This patch is based on Martin's cache branch.
This patch amends the cache bank capability as follow:
It helps a lot if you wait for a conclusion on a patch before sending
another version as soon as you can change one line.
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 08:20:56PM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:
> This patch is based on Martin's cache branch.
>
> This patch amends the cache bank capability as follow:
>
>
>
>
>
Why do we need to report 'type' on both bank & control elements. Are they
really expected to have different v
This patch is based on Martin's cache branch.
This patch amends the cache bank capability as follow:
Along with vircaps2xmltest case updated.
Signed-off-by: Eli Qiao
---
src/conf/capabilities.c | 120 ++-
src/conf/capabiliti
16 matches
Mail list logo