On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 09:33:50AM -0500, Scott Garfinkle wrote:
> It's possible to have more than one unnamed virtio-serial unix channel.
> We need to generate a unique name for each channel. Currently, we use
> ".../unknown.sock" for all of them. Better practice would be to specify
> an explicit
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 09:33:50AM -0500, Scott Garfinkle wrote:
It's possible to have more than one unnamed virtio-serial unix channel.
We need to generate a unique name for each channel. Currently, we use
".../unknown.sock" for all of them. Better practice would be to specify
an explicit target
It's possible to have more than one unnamed virtio-serial unix channel.
We need to generate a unique name for each channel. Currently, we use
".../unknown.sock" for all of them. Better practice would be to specify
an explicit target path name; however, in the absence of that, we need
uniqueness in