On 27.10.2015 17:53, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 16:29:51 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251190
>>
>> So, if domain loses access to storage, sanlock tries to kill it
>> after some timeout. So far, the default is 80 seconds. But for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251190
So, if domain loses access to storage, sanlock tries to kill it
after some timeout. So far, the default is 80 seconds. But for
some scenarios this might not be enough. We should allow users to
adjust the timeout according to their needs.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 16:29:51 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251190
>
> So, if domain loses access to storage, sanlock tries to kill it
> after some timeout. So far, the default is 80 seconds. But for
> some scenarios this might not be enough. We