Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2] macvtap: convert nl msg construction to use libnl

2010-11-12 Thread Laine Stump
On 11/04/2010 06:57 AM, Stefan Berger wrote: V2: - forgot to convert two more function that were hidden in #defines - small nits In a first step I am converting the netlink message construction in macvtap code to use libnl. It's pretty much a 1:1 conversion except that now the message

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2] macvtap: convert nl msg construction to use libnl

2010-11-12 Thread Stefan Berger
On 11/12/2010 02:57 AM, Laine Stump wrote: On 11/04/2010 06:57 AM, Stefan Berger wrote: V2: - forgot to convert two more function that were hidden in #defines - small nits In a first step I am converting the netlink message construction in macvtap code to use libnl. It's pretty much a

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2] macvtap: convert nl msg construction to use libnl

2010-11-11 Thread Stefan Berger
Any comments on this one? Stefan On 11/04/2010 06:57 AM, Stefan Berger wrote: V2: - forgot to convert two more function that were hidden in #defines - small nits In a first step I am converting the netlink message construction in macvtap code to use libnl. It's pretty much a 1:1

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2] macvtap: convert nl msg construction to use libnl

2010-11-11 Thread Laine Stump
git am says the patch is corrupted. Possibly because the Content-Type includes 'Format=flowed'? On 11/11/2010 08:51 AM, Stefan Berger wrote: Any comments on this one? Stefan On 11/04/2010 06:57 AM, Stefan Berger wrote: V2: - forgot to convert two more function that were hidden in

[libvirt] [PATCH v2] macvtap: convert nl msg construction to use libnl

2010-11-04 Thread Stefan Berger
V2: - forgot to convert two more function that were hidden in #defines - small nits In a first step I am converting the netlink message construction in macvtap code to use libnl. It's pretty much a 1:1 conversion except that now the message needs to be allocated and deallocated.