On 31.10.2016 10:10, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote:
>
>
> On 28.10.2016 20:57, John Ferlan wrote:
>>
>> No commit message... This definitely needs one.
>>
>> Also when there's one patch, you don't need a cover letter - instead you
>> put whatever "message" you want to give to reviewers, the
On 28.10.2016 20:57, John Ferlan wrote:
>
> No commit message... This definitely needs one.
>
> Also when there's one patch, you don't need a cover letter - instead you
> put whatever "message" you want to give to reviewers, the pointer to the
> previous version, changes with the current code,
No commit message... This definitely needs one.
Also when there's one patch, you don't need a cover letter - instead you
put whatever "message" you want to give to reviewers, the pointer to the
previous version, changes with the current code, etc. after the "---"
---
src/qemu/qemu_blockjob.c | 13 +--
src/qemu/qemu_blockjob.h | 3 ++-
src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 1 +
src/qemu/qemu_domain.h | 1 +
src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 4 ++--
src/qemu/qemu_migration.c| 54 +++-
So that you can see nice report on migration:
"error: operation failed: migration of disk sda failed: No space left on device"
diff from v1:
1. drop 1 patch. Avoiding default label in switches is desired style.
2. drop 2 patch. I do not investigate enough to touch that place.
3. fix 3 patch
