Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2] spec: Fix minor changelog issues

2013-02-05 Thread Jiri Denemark
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 10:06:28 -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > On 02/01/2013 05:53 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote: > > When a changelog entry references an RPM macro, % needs to be escaped so > > that it does not appear expanded in package changelog. > > > > Fri Mar 4 2009 is incorrect since Mar 4 was Wedn

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2] spec: Fix minor changelog issues

2013-02-01 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 10:06:28AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > On 02/01/2013 05:53 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote: > > When a changelog entry references an RPM macro, % needs to be escaped so > > that it does not appear expanded in package changelog. > > > > Fri Mar 4 2009 is incorrect since Mar 4 was We

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2] spec: Fix minor changelog issues

2013-02-01 Thread Eric Blake
On 02/01/2013 05:53 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote: > When a changelog entry references an RPM macro, % needs to be escaped so > that it does not appear expanded in package changelog. > > Fri Mar 4 2009 is incorrect since Mar 4 was Wednesday. Since > libvirt-0.6.1 was released on Mar 4 2009, we should c

[libvirt] [PATCH v2] spec: Fix minor changelog issues

2013-02-01 Thread Jiri Denemark
When a changelog entry references an RPM macro, % needs to be escaped so that it does not appear expanded in package changelog. Fri Mar 4 2009 is incorrect since Mar 4 was Wednesday. Since libvirt-0.6.1 was released on Mar 4 2009, we should change Fri to Wed. --- libvirt.spec.in | 4 ++-- 1 file