On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:12:28 +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
>
>
> On 21/09/15 19:46, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > Although 0 length block jobs aren't entirely useful, the output of virsh
> > blockjob is empty due to the condition that suppresses the output for
> > migration jobs that did not start. S
On 21/09/15 19:46, Peter Krempa wrote:
> Although 0 length block jobs aren't entirely useful, the output of virsh
> blockjob is empty due to the condition that suppresses the output for
> migration jobs that did not start. Since the only place that actually
> uses the condition that suppresses th
Although 0 length block jobs aren't entirely useful, the output of virsh
blockjob is empty due to the condition that suppresses the output for
migration jobs that did not start. Since the only place that actually
uses the condition that suppresses the output is in migration, let's
move the check th
