Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix possible use-after-free when sending event message

2017-04-23 Thread John Ferlan
Ping? Tks John On 04/12/2017 07:58 PM, John Ferlan wrote: > > ping? > > Tks, - > > John > > On 04/03/2017 10:12 AM, John Ferlan wrote: >> >> >> On 03/27/2017 12:47 PM, John Ferlan wrote: >>> v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-March/msg01228.html >>> >>> Change since v1, ad

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix possible use-after-free when sending event message

2017-04-12 Thread John Ferlan
ping? Tks, - John On 04/03/2017 10:12 AM, John Ferlan wrote: > > > On 03/27/2017 12:47 PM, John Ferlan wrote: >> v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-March/msg01228.html >> >> Change since v1, add the derefFcn as an argument to the renamed macro >> (not quite sure how I missed

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix possible use-after-free when sending event message

2017-04-03 Thread John Ferlan
On 03/27/2017 12:47 PM, John Ferlan wrote: > v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-March/msg01228.html > > Change since v1, add the derefFcn as an argument to the renamed macro > (not quite sure how I missed that originally. > > John Ferlan (2): > daemon: Rework remoteClientFre

[libvirt] [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix possible use-after-free when sending event message

2017-03-27 Thread John Ferlan
v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-March/msg01228.html Change since v1, add the derefFcn as an argument to the renamed macro (not quite sure how I missed that originally. John Ferlan (2): daemon: Rework remoteClientFreeFunc cleanup loops into C macro remote: Fix possible use