Hi
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 4:40 PM Marc-André Lureau
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 5:15 PM wrote:
> >
> > From: Marc-André Lureau
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is an alternative series from "[PATCH 0/5] Use memfd if
> > possible". Instead of automatically using memfd for anonymous memory
Hi
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 5:15 PM wrote:
>
> From: Marc-André Lureau
>
> Hi,
>
> This is an alternative series from "[PATCH 0/5] Use memfd if
> possible". Instead of automatically using memfd for anonymous memory
> when available (as suggested by Daniel), it introduces the "memfd"
> memory
From: Marc-André Lureau
Hi,
This is an alternative series from "[PATCH 0/5] Use memfd if
possible". Instead of automatically using memfd for anonymous memory
when available (as suggested by Daniel), it introduces the "memfd"
memory backing type.
Although using memfd transparently when possible
