On 08/03/2017 11:34 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 08/01/2017 02:05 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
>> v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-July/msg01313.html
>>
>> Differences from v1:
>>
>> * Use the names virObjectRWLockRead, virObjectRWLockWrite and
>>virObjectRWUnlock
>>
>> *
On 08/01/2017 02:05 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
> v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-July/msg01313.html
>
> Differences from v1:
>
> * Use the names virObjectRWLockRead, virObjectRWLockWrite and
>virObjectRWUnlock
>
> * Instead of an 'int' return, make the
v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-July/msg01313.html
Differences from v1:
* Use the names virObjectRWLockRead, virObjectRWLockWrite and
virObjectRWUnlock
* Instead of an 'int' return, make the virObjectRWLock{Read|Write} be
void returns just like