Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 0/8] Some virObjectRW* adjustments

2017-08-03 Thread John Ferlan
On 08/03/2017 11:34 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 08/01/2017 02:05 AM, John Ferlan wrote: >> v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-July/msg01313.html >> >> Differences from v1: >> >> * Use the names virObjectRWLockRead, virObjectRWLockWrite and >>virObjectRWUnlock >> >> *

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 0/8] Some virObjectRW* adjustments

2017-08-03 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 08/01/2017 02:05 AM, John Ferlan wrote: > v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-July/msg01313.html > > Differences from v1: > > * Use the names virObjectRWLockRead, virObjectRWLockWrite and >virObjectRWUnlock > > * Instead of an 'int' return, make the

[libvirt] [PATCH v2 0/8] Some virObjectRW* adjustments

2017-07-31 Thread John Ferlan
v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-July/msg01313.html Differences from v1: * Use the names virObjectRWLockRead, virObjectRWLockWrite and virObjectRWUnlock * Instead of an 'int' return, make the virObjectRWLock{Read|Write} be void returns just like