On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:52:54AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:29:21AM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:12:54AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 09:50:49AM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 05,
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:29:21AM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:12:54AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 09:50:49AM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 04:36:24PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > If formatting NUMA topology
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:12:54AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 09:50:49AM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 04:36:24PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > > If formatting NUMA topology fails, the function returns immediatelly,
> > > but the
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 09:50:49AM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 04:36:24PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
If formatting NUMA topology fails, the function returns immediatelly,
but the buffer structure allocated on the stack references lot of
heap-allocated memory and
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 09:50:49 +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 04:36:24PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > If formatting NUMA topology fails, the function returns immediatelly,
> > but the buffer structure allocated on the stack references lot of
> > heap-allocated
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 04:36:24PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> If formatting NUMA topology fails, the function returns immediatelly,
> but the buffer structure allocated on the stack references lot of
> heap-allocated memory and that would get lost in such case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin
If formatting NUMA topology fails, the function returns immediatelly,
but the buffer structure allocated on the stack references lot of
heap-allocated memory and that would get lost in such case.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander
---
src/conf/capabilities.c | 6 +-
1