Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 06/11] docs: document cpu host-passthrough migration issue

2016-12-16 Thread Jiri Denemark
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 13:25:33 -0500, Jason J. Herne wrote: > On 12/15/2016 11:18 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote: > > I'd say "may" rather than "will very likely" :-) The likelihood of such > > behavior depends on a lot of factors, such as the host architecture, the > > way the hosts differ, etc. For ex

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 06/11] docs: document cpu host-passthrough migration issue

2016-12-15 Thread Jason J. Herne
On 12/15/2016 11:18 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote: On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 14:38:35 -0500, Jason J. Herne wrote: Documents in formatdomain.html that when migrating a guest defined with the host-passthrough CPU model from a machine that is running on a newer CPU model than the destination machine's CPU

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 06/11] docs: document cpu host-passthrough migration issue

2016-12-15 Thread Jiri Denemark
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 14:38:35 -0500, Jason J. Herne wrote: > Documents in formatdomain.html that when migrating a guest > defined with the host-passthrough CPU model from a machine that > is running on a newer CPU model than the destination machine's > CPU model, it is very likely that the guest

[libvirt] [PATCH v2 06/11] docs: document cpu host-passthrough migration issue

2016-12-09 Thread Jason J. Herne
Documents in formatdomain.html that when migrating a guest defined with the host-passthrough CPU model from a machine that is running on a newer CPU model than the destination machine's CPU model, it is very likely that the guest will crash upon arrival. Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne --- docs/fo