On 05.06.2019 12:09, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Changing domain definition must be guarded with acquiring modify
> job. The problem is if there is a thread executing say
> qemuDomainSetMemoryStatsPeriod() which is an API that acquires
> modify job and then possibly unlock the domain object and
On 05.06.2019 12:09, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Changing domain definition must be guarded with acquiring modify
> job. The problem is if there is a thread executing say
> qemuDomainSetMemoryStatsPeriod() which is an API that acquires
> modify job and then possibly unlock the domain object and
On 6/5/19 11:32 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 11:09:14 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
Changing domain definition must be guarded with acquiring modify
job. The problem is if there is a thread executing say
qemuDomainSetMemoryStatsPeriod() which is an API that acquires
modify
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 11:09:14 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Changing domain definition must be guarded with acquiring modify
> job. The problem is if there is a thread executing say
> qemuDomainSetMemoryStatsPeriod() which is an API that acquires
> modify job and then possibly unlock the
Changing domain definition must be guarded with acquiring modify
job. The problem is if there is a thread executing say
qemuDomainSetMemoryStatsPeriod() which is an API that acquires
modify job and then possibly unlock the domain object and locks
it again. However, becasue virDomainObjAssignDef()