On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:10:55 -0500, Collin L. Walling wrote:
> On 12/15/2016 11:10 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > We already have a lot of tests that use the ±feature syntax so there's
> > no real need to add another one. However, we could use it as a negative
> > test since s390 does not support
On 12/15/2016 11:10 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
We already have a lot of tests that use the ±feature syntax so there's
no real need to add another one. However, we could use it as a negative
test since s390 does not support the old syntax. So how about:
DO_TEST("cpu-s390-features", QEMU_CAPS_K
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 14:38:37 -0500, Jason J. Herne wrote:
> Test that libvirt generates the correct cpu feature syntax when
> query-cpu-model-expansion is supported and when it is not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne
> ---
> .../qemuxml2argv-cpu-features-post-qcme.args | 19 +
Test that libvirt generates the correct cpu feature syntax when
query-cpu-model-expansion is supported and when it is not.
Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne
---
.../qemuxml2argv-cpu-features-post-qcme.args | 19 ++
.../qemuxml2argv-cpu-features-post-qcme.xml| 23 +++
