On 11.02.2015 18:34, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/11/2015 07:04 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 10.02.2015 16:35, Martin Kletzander wrote:
snip/
+
+typedef enum {
+VIR_PROC_POLICY_NONE,
+VIR_PROC_POLICY_BATCH,
+VIR_PROC_POLICY_IDLE,
+VIR_PROC_POLICY_FIFO,
+
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 16:35:19 +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote:
This function uses sched_setscheduler() function so it works with
processes and threads as well (even threads not created by us, which is
what we'll need in the future).
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander mklet...@redhat.com
---
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 09:14:29 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 11.02.2015 18:34, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/11/2015 07:04 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 10.02.2015 16:35, Martin Kletzander wrote:
...
If it is so, is it worth bothering with cleanup patch(es)? There's
Worth? I don't think
On 02/11/2015 07:04 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 10.02.2015 16:35, Martin Kletzander wrote:
This function uses sched_setscheduler() function so it works with
processes and threads as well (even threads not created by us, which is
what we'll need in the future).
On 10.02.2015 16:35, Martin Kletzander wrote:
This function uses sched_setscheduler() function so it works with
processes and threads as well (even threads not created by us, which is
what we'll need in the future).
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander mklet...@redhat.com
---
configure.ac
This function uses sched_setscheduler() function so it works with
processes and threads as well (even threads not created by us, which is
what we'll need in the future).
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander mklet...@redhat.com
---
configure.ac | 4 +-
src/libvirt_private.syms | 1 +
