On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 17:00:37 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 11/21/19 3:31 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 14:02:49 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > > On 11/20/19 3:22 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > > >
>
> New commit message:
>
> qemuProcessStop: Remove image meta
On 11/21/19 3:31 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 14:02:49 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 11/20/19 3:22 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
New commit message:
qemuProcessStop: Remove image metadata for running mirror jobs
If user starts a blockcommit or a blockcopy then we m
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 14:02:49 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 11/20/19 3:22 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> >
>
> Okay, how about this commit message:
>
> qemuProcessStop: Remove image metadata for running mirror jobs
>
> If user starts a blockcommit without --pivot or a blockcopy also
> withou
On 11/20/19 3:22 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>
Okay, how about this commit message:
qemuProcessStop: Remove image metadata for running mirror jobs
If user starts a blockcommit without --pivot or a blockcopy also
without --pivot then we modify access for qemu on both images and
leave it like that un
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 15:10:17 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 11/20/19 12:17 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 14:15:12 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > > If user starts a blockcommit without --pivot or a blockcopy also
> > > without --pivot then we modify access for qemu
On 11/20/19 12:17 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 14:15:12 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
If user starts a blockcommit without --pivot or a blockcopy also
without --pivot then we modify access for qemu on both images and
leave it like that until pivot is executed. So far so good.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 14:15:12 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> If user starts a blockcommit without --pivot or a blockcopy also
> without --pivot then we modify access for qemu on both images and
> leave it like that until pivot is executed. So far so good.
> Problem is, if user instead of issui
If user starts a blockcommit without --pivot or a blockcopy also
without --pivot then we modify access for qemu on both images and
leave it like that until pivot is executed. So far so good.
Problem is, if user instead of issuing pivot calls destroy on the
domain or if qemu dies whilst executing th
