On 08/26/2014 09:00 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On 08/26/14 13:21, Eric Blake wrote:
>> I'm about to extend the capabilities of blockcopy. Hiding a few
>> common lines of implementation gets in the way of the new required
>> logic, and putting the new logic in the common implementation won't
>> bene
On 08/26/14 13:21, Eric Blake wrote:
> I'm about to extend the capabilities of blockcopy. Hiding a few
> common lines of implementation gets in the way of the new required
> logic, and putting the new logic in the common implementation won't
> benefit any of the other blockjob operations. Therefo
I'm about to extend the capabilities of blockcopy. Hiding a few
common lines of implementation gets in the way of the new required
logic, and putting the new logic in the common implementation won't
benefit any of the other blockjob operations. Therefore, it is
simpler to just do the work inline.
