On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 22:24:34 -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 02/15/2017 11:44 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > virCPUDef.arch is not required to be filled in for guest CPU
> > definitions. It doesn't make sense to artificially mandate it to be set
> > when cpuDecode is called especially when
On 02/15/2017 11:44 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> virCPUDef.arch is not required to be filled in for guest CPU
> definitions. It doesn't make sense to artificially mandate it to be set
> when cpuDecode is called especially when virCPUData.arch passed to
> cpuDecode already contains the
virCPUDef.arch is not required to be filled in for guest CPU
definitions. It doesn't make sense to artificially mandate it to be set
when cpuDecode is called especially when virCPUData.arch passed to
cpuDecode already contains the architecture.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark