Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 7/12] storage: Refactor and fix virStorageBackendCreateExecCommand

2015-10-20 Thread John Ferlan
Ping or should I just resend what's left rather than 3 adjusted and inserted patches? Tks, John On 10/14/2015 02:01 PM, John Ferlan wrote: > Refactor the code to handle the NETFS pool separately from other pool > types. When the original code was developed (commit id 'e1f27784') > the

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 7/12] storage: Refactor and fix virStorageBackendCreateExecCommand

2015-10-14 Thread John Ferlan
Yes, this should have read 8/12... On 10/14/2015 02:01 PM, John Ferlan wrote: > Refactor the code to handle the NETFS pool separately from other pool > types. When the original code was developed (commit id 'e1f27784') > the virCommandSetUmask did not exist (commit id '0e1a1a8c4'), so there >

[libvirt] [PATCH v2 7/12] storage: Refactor and fix virStorageBackendCreateExecCommand

2015-10-14 Thread John Ferlan
Refactor the code to handle the NETFS pool separately from other pool types. When the original code was developed (commit id 'e1f27784') the virCommandSetUmask did not exist (commit id '0e1a1a8c4'), so there was no way to set the permissions for the creation. Now that it exists, we can use it. The