On 06/19/2014 02:32 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On 06/19/14 00:41, Eric Blake wrote:
>> When the block job event was first added, it was for block pull,
>> where the active layer of the disk remains the same name. It was
>> also in a day where we only cared about local files, and so we
>> always had
On 06/19/14 00:41, Eric Blake wrote:
> When the block job event was first added, it was for block pull,
> where the active layer of the disk remains the same name. It was
> also in a day where we only cared about local files, and so we
> always had a canonical absolute file name. But two things h
When the block job event was first added, it was for block pull,
where the active layer of the disk remains the same name. It was
also in a day where we only cared about local files, and so we
always had a canonical absolute file name. But two things have
changed since then: we now have network d
