On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 09:22 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 09:13:09AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > When looking for a QEMU binary suitable for running ppc64le guests
> > we have to take into account the fact that we use the QEMU target
> > as key for the hash, so d
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 09:13:09AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> When looking for a QEMU binary suitable for running ppc64le guests
> we have to take into account the fact that we use the QEMU target
> as key for the hash, so direct comparison is not good enough.
>
> Factor out the logic from v
When looking for a QEMU binary suitable for running ppc64le guests
we have to take into account the fact that we use the QEMU target
as key for the hash, so direct comparison is not good enough.
Factor out the logic from virQEMUCapsFindBinaryForArch() to a new
virQEMUCapsFindTarget() function and