On 06/11/2013 12:23 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On 06/10/13 14:43, Ján Tomko wrote:
>> This fixes a crash:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969878
>> ---
>> v3:
>> rewrote the patch to assume 's0' if the range is empty, instead
>> of reporting an error
>>
>> v2:
>> https://www.redhat.co
On 06/10/13 14:43, Ján Tomko wrote:
This fixes a crash:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969878
---
v3:
rewrote the patch to assume 's0' if the range is empty, instead
of reporting an error
v2:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-June/msg00082.html
src/security/securit
This fixes a crash:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969878
---
v3:
rewrote the patch to assume 's0' if the range is empty, instead
of reporting an error
v2:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-June/msg00082.html
src/security/security_selinux.c | 9 +++--
tests/securi