Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v3] selinux: assume 's0' if the range is empty

2013-06-11 Thread Ján Tomko
On 06/11/2013 12:23 PM, Peter Krempa wrote: > On 06/10/13 14:43, Ján Tomko wrote: >> This fixes a crash: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969878 >> --- >> v3: >> rewrote the patch to assume 's0' if the range is empty, instead >> of reporting an error >> >> v2: >> https://www.redhat.co

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v3] selinux: assume 's0' if the range is empty

2013-06-11 Thread Peter Krempa
On 06/10/13 14:43, Ján Tomko wrote: This fixes a crash: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969878 --- v3: rewrote the patch to assume 's0' if the range is empty, instead of reporting an error v2: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-June/msg00082.html src/security/securit

[libvirt] [PATCH v3] selinux: assume 's0' if the range is empty

2013-06-10 Thread Ján Tomko
This fixes a crash: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969878 --- v3: rewrote the patch to assume 's0' if the range is empty, instead of reporting an error v2: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-June/msg00082.html src/security/security_selinux.c | 9 +++-- tests/securi