On 11/16/18 9:43 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>>
>> I've did the review and all three patches look good to me. I've fixed
>> all the issues I've found and I'm keeping them in a local branch of mine
>> to give others some time to raise their concerns should they have some.
>>
>> My main
Hi
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 5:56 PM Michal Privoznik wrote:
>
> On 11/15/2018 12:55 PM, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Marc-André Lureau
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is an alternative series from "[PATCH 0/5] Use memfd if
> > possible". Instead of automatically using memfd for
On 11/15/2018 12:55 PM, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Marc-André Lureau
>
> Hi,
>
> This is an alternative series from "[PATCH 0/5] Use memfd if
> possible". Instead of automatically using memfd for anonymous memory
> when available (as suggested by Daniel), it introduces the
From: Marc-André Lureau
Hi,
This is an alternative series from "[PATCH 0/5] Use memfd if
possible". Instead of automatically using memfd for anonymous memory
when available (as suggested by Daniel), it introduces the "memfd"
memory backing type.
Although using memfd transparently when possible
