On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 14:18:31 +0100, Matthias Gatto wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Matthias Gatto
>> wrote:
>> > The purpose of these patches is to introduce quorum for libvirt
>> > I've try to follow this proposal:
>> > http:/
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 14:18:31 +0100, Matthias Gatto wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Matthias Gatto
> wrote:
> > The purpose of these patches is to introduce quorum for libvirt
> > I've try to follow this proposal:
> > http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-May/msg00533.html
>
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Matthias Gatto
wrote:
> The purpose of these patches is to introduce quorum for libvirt
> I've try to follow this proposal:
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-May/msg00533.html
>
> This feature ask for 6 task:
>
> 1) Allow a _virStorageSource to cont
The purpose of these patches is to introduce quorum for libvirt
I've try to follow this proposal:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-May/msg00533.html
This feature ask for 6 task:
1) Allow a _virStorageSource to contain more than one backing store.
Because all the actual libvirt cod
