On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 12:25:06 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> As discussed, does it make sense to add the default change to host-model for
> s390
> in this series or should that be a separate patch?
Originally I wanted to do it as a separate patch, but since no review
has apparently
As discussed, does it make sense to add the default change to host-model for
s390
in this series or should that be a separate patch?
On 05.11.19 14:26, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> When starting a domain without a CPU model specified in the domain XML,
> QEMU will choose a default one. Which is fine
When starting a domain without a CPU model specified in the domain XML,
QEMU will choose a default one. Which is fine unless the domain gets
migrated to another host because libvirt doesn't perform any CPU ABI
checks and the virtual CPU provided by QEMU on the destination host can
differ from the
