On 03/11/2017 09:56 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 03/11/2017 10:34 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
>> On 03/10/2017 04:10 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428209
>>>
>>> Commit id 'bb74a7ffe' neglected to check that both the parent_wwnn
>>> parent_wwpn are in the XML i
On 03/11/2017 10:34 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 03/10/2017 04:10 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428209
>>
>> Commit id 'bb74a7ffe' neglected to check that both the parent_wwnn
>> parent_wwpn are in the XML if one or the other is similar to how
>> the node dev
On 03/10/2017 04:10 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428209
>
> Commit id 'bb74a7ffe' neglected to check that both the parent_wwnn
> parent_wwpn are in the XML if one or the other is similar to how
> the node device code checked (commit id '2b13361bc').
>
> If o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428209
Commit id 'bb74a7ffe' neglected to check that both the parent_wwnn
parent_wwpn are in the XML if one or the other is similar to how
the node device code checked (commit id '2b13361bc').
If only one is provided, the "default" is to use a vHBA cap