On 2/25/19 2:01 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 23.02.2019 3:06, John Snow wrote:
>> "Frozen" was a good description a long time ago, but it isn't adequate now.
>> Rename the frozen predicate to has_successor to make the semantics of the
>> predicate more clear to outside callers.
>>
23.02.2019 3:06, John Snow wrote:
> "Frozen" was a good description a long time ago, but it isn't adequate now.
> Rename the frozen predicate to has_successor to make the semantics of the
> predicate more clear to outside callers.
>
> In the process, remove some calls to frozen() that no longer
On 2/22/19 6:06 PM, John Snow wrote:
> "Frozen" was a good description a long time ago, but it isn't adequate now.
> Rename the frozen predicate to has_successor to make the semantics of the
> predicate more clear to outside callers.
>
> In the process, remove some calls to frozen() that no
"Frozen" was a good description a long time ago, but it isn't adequate now.
Rename the frozen predicate to has_successor to make the semantics of the
predicate more clear to outside callers.
In the process, remove some calls to frozen() that no longer semantically
make sense. For
