On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 03:15:23PM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> The original test didn't use family/model numbers to make better
> decisions about the CPU model and thus mis-detected the model in the two
> cases which are modified in this commit. The detected CPU models now
> match those obtained
The original test didn't use family/model numbers to make better
decisions about the CPU model and thus mis-detected the model in the two
cases which are modified in this commit. The detected CPU models now
match those obtained from raw CPUID data.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark