On 4/17/19 8:27 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
On 4/11/19 8:43 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 13:37:49 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 4/11/19 12:12 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
All that said, I think a good solution would be (2). dompmsuspend
isn't a
On 4/11/19 8:43 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 13:37:49 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 4/11/19 12:12 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
All that said, I think a good solution would be (2). dompmsuspend isn't a
performance sensitive command, thus the extra time to
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 13:49:03 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 4/11/19 12:19 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:58:04 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > > On 4/11/19 10:39 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:25:11 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 4/11/19 12:19 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:58:04 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 4/11/19 10:39 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:25:11 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
This capability tells whether qemu is capable of waking up the
guest from PM
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 13:37:49 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 4/11/19 12:12 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> >
> >
> > All that said, I think a good solution would be (2). dompmsuspend isn't a
> > performance sensitive command, thus the extra time to execute the API
> > can be ignored.
On 4/11/19 12:12 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>
All that said, I think a good solution would be (2). dompmsuspend isn't a
performance sensitive command, thus the extra time to execute the API
can be ignored. Also, we can still check for
QEMU_CAPS_QUERY_CURRENT_MACHINE
inside
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:58:04 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 4/11/19 10:39 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:25:11 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > > This capability tells whether qemu is capable of waking up the
> > > guest from PM suspend.
> > >
> > >
On 4/11/19 6:58 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 4/11/19 10:39 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:25:11 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
This capability tells whether qemu is capable of waking up the
guest from PM suspend.
Based-on-work-of: Daniel Henrique Barboza
On 4/11/19 10:39 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:25:11 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
This capability tells whether qemu is capable of waking up the
guest from PM suspend.
Based-on-work-of: Daniel Henrique Barboza
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik
---
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:25:11 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> This capability tells whether qemu is capable of waking up the
> guest from PM suspend.
>
> Based-on-work-of: Daniel Henrique Barboza
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 24
This capability tells whether qemu is capable of waking up the
guest from PM suspend.
Based-on-work-of: Daniel Henrique Barboza
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik
---
src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 24 +++
src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h | 3 +++
11 matches
Mail list logo
