On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 03:51:30PM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 02/03/2016 03:23 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:14:01AM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 02/02/2016 08:30 AM, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:11:51AM +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
On 02/04/2016 04:53 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 03:51:30PM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/03/2016 03:23 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:14:01AM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
On 02/02/2016 08:30 AM, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> On Tue, Feb
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:14:01AM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 02/02/2016 08:30 AM, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:11:51AM +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 03:29:53PM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
> >>> Modify the regex for the 'devices' (a/k/a
On 02/03/2016 03:23 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:14:01AM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/02/2016 08:30 AM, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:11:51AM +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 03:29:53PM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
>
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 03:29:53PM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
> Modify the regex for the 'devices' (a/k/a 'extents') from "(\\S+)"
> (e.g., 1 or more) to "(\\S*)" (e.g., zero or more).
>
> Then for any "thin" lv's found, mark the volume as a sparse volume so
> that the volume wipe algorithm
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:11:51AM +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 03:29:53PM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
> > Modify the regex for the 'devices' (a/k/a 'extents') from "(\\S+)"
> > (e.g., 1 or more) to "(\\S*)" (e.g., zero or more).
> >
> > Then for any "thin" lv's found, mark the
On 02/02/2016 08:30 AM, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:11:51AM +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 03:29:53PM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
>>> Modify the regex for the 'devices' (a/k/a 'extents') from "(\\S+)"
>>> (e.g., 1 or more) to "(\\S*)" (e.g., zero or more).
On 02/02/2016 03:11 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 03:29:53PM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
>> Modify the regex for the 'devices' (a/k/a 'extents') from "(\\S+)"
>> (e.g., 1 or more) to "(\\S*)" (e.g., zero or more).
>>
>> Then for any "thin" lv's found, mark the volume as a sparse
Modify the regex for the 'devices' (a/k/a 'extents') from "(\\S+)"
(e.g., 1 or more) to "(\\S*)" (e.g., zero or more).
Then for any "thin" lv's found, mark the volume as a sparse volume so
that the volume wipe algorithm doesn't work.
Since a "thin" segtype has no devices, this will result in any